India–China Relations: Strategic Rivalry, Diplomatic Reset & BRICS Engagement
Syllabus Mapping
| Paper | Topics |
| GS Paper 2 | International Relations, India and its Neighborhood, Bilateral Relations, Groupings (BRICS, SCO, G20) |
| GS Paper 3 | Border Management, Internal Security, Strategic Challenges |
| Essay Paper | India’s Foreign Policy, Multipolar World, Asia’s Future |
Context: Diplomatic Reset Amidst Strategic Stalemate
In July 2025, Dr. S. Jaishankar’s visit to China marked the first senior-level bilateral diplomatic outreach since the 2020 Galwan Valley Clash. The visit attempted to reset ties marred by:
- Border tensions along the Line of Actual Control (LAC)
- Strategic mistrust post-Galwan
- Rising trade imbalance
- Diverging ambitions in global leadership forums such as BRICS and the Global South
Key Objectives of the 2025 Visit
| Objective | Description |
| Border Stabilisation | Reinitiate phased disengagement (Depsang, Demchok) |
| Revive Dialogue | Strengthen WMCC, Corps Commander meetings |
| Trade Balance | Address $100+ bn deficit, increase market access |
| Multilateral Synergy | Align on BRICS+, G20, SCO reform |
| Geo-strategic Deterrence | Curb China-Pakistan collusion in South Asia |
Strategic Highlights
Border Talks
- Reaffirmed 2013 Border Defence Cooperation Agreement (BDCA)
- India demanded LAC de-escalation before diplomatic normalisation
Trade & Economic Diplomacy
- India raised asymmetry in imports, especially in electronics, APIs, solar tech
- China showed openness to revive Joint Economic Group
BRICS & Multilateralism
- Consensus on BRICS+ expansion
- China appreciated India’s Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) models (UPI, CoWIN)
People-to-People Engagement
- Resumption of tourism, student visas
- Re-activation of India–China High-Level Mechanism
Multilateral Outlook: BRICS as Strategic Theatre
| Focus Area | India’s Position | China’s Strategy |
| Digital Finance | DPI exports (UPI, ONDC) | Push for yuan digitalisation |
| Global South | Rights-based development | Infrastructure-led BRI |
| Global Governance | WTO/IMF reform | Status-quo but multipolar resistance |
| Membership | Advocated BRICS+ | Seeks expansion for leverage |
Strategic Dimensions
- Bilateral Dimension
- WMCC & Corps Commander Talks: These are institutional-level mechanisms to manage tensions and maintain peace along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). Their revival signals a diplomatic thaw.
- Three Mutuals Doctrine: India emphasizes “Mutual Respect, Mutual Sensitivity, and Mutual Interests” as the foundation for restoring trust and building normalcy.
- Regional Dimension
- China–Pakistan Axis: India is deeply concerned about Chinese support to Pakistan, especially projects like CPEC through PoK, which violates Indian sovereignty.
- UPI Diplomacy: India is using its Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) (like UPI) to expand influence in South Asia—seen in its adoption by Nepal, Bhutan, Namibia, countering China’s Belt & Road Initiative (BRI).
- Global Dimension
- Leadership in Global South: Both nations are vying for influence, but with different models—India via democratic tech-driven diplomacy (DPI), China via infrastructure-heavy BRI.
- Western Digital Governance Resistance: Despite rivalries, India and China often oppose Western-led digital frameworks (like data localisation, AI rules) in forums like WTO and UN.
- Economic Dimension
- Trade Asymmetry: India faces a $100+ billion trade deficit with China, heavily reliant on electronics, APIs, and solar components.
- Diversification Strategy:
- PLI (Production Linked Incentive) schemes to boost local manufacturing.
- FTAs with Europe & ASEAN to reduce dependency on Chinese imports.
- Security Dimension
- Infrastructure Race: Both sides are rapidly upgrading roads, bridges, and military logistics along the LAC—especially in Ladakh and Arunachal.
- New-Age Security Domains:
- Deployment of drones, surveillance tech, and cyber tools shows that modern warfare is shifting towards hybrid domains.
- Technology & Digital Sovereignty
- India’s DPI vs China’s Great Firewall: India promotes open, interoperable digital infrastructure, while China enforces tight internet control.
- App Bans & 5G Exclusion: India has banned over 250 Chinese apps post-Galwan and excluded Chinese firms like Huawei from its 5G rollout—reflecting techno-strategic decoupling.
Real-Time Catalysts
- China’s Economic Slowdown: Seeks new partners
- India’s Semiconductor Ambitions: Global attention, Beijing wary
- US–China Rivalry: India as a QUAD hedge
- AI & Climate Diplomacy: Competition and cooperation
Challenges Ahead in India–China Relations
- Strategic Trust Deficit
- The 2020 Galwan clashled to a severe erosion of trust.
- Military and diplomatic engagements are shadowed by suspicion and lack of transparency.
- LAC Misalignment
- India adheres to the Johnson Line, while China follows the Macartney–MacDonald Line.
- Differing perceptions lead to repeated face-offs at flashpoints like Depsang, Pangong Tso, and Demchok.
- Digital Sovereignty Conflict
- India promotes open-source DPI(e.g., UPI, CoWIN), while China relies on closed digital ecosystems.
- Conflicting ideologies on data governance, surveillance, and AIstrain tech cooperation.
- Economic Dependence
- India’s high import reliance on China in critical sectors (electronics, APIs, solar panels).
- Hampers Atmanirbhar Bharatand supply chain resilience goals.
- Third-Party Strategic Influence
- China–Pakistan nexus: Beijing’s stance on PoKand investments in CPEC challenge India’s sovereignty.
- India’s strategic tilt towards the US, QUAD, and IPEFadds to Chinese insecurity.
Conclusion
Dr. Jaishankar’s 2025 visit reflects India’s maturing diplomatic posture: assertive yet pragmatic. While core frictions persist, especially on LAC and trade imbalance, issue-based cooperation in BRICS, AI governance, and DPI diplomacy is emerging. For UPSC aspirants, this scenario underscores how competition and cooperation coexist in contemporary foreign policy — a fine example of realist diplomacy with civilizational undertones.
Mains Practice Questions
- India–China relations reflect a complex interplay of cooperation, conflict, and competition. Discuss in light of recent diplomatic engagements.
- Evaluate how BRICS can serve as a platform for India to manage China while enhancing its leadership role in the Global South.
- How does India’s emphasis on Digital Public Infrastructure act as a counterweight to China’s Belt and Road Initiative?
- Critically examine the implications of the 2025 India–China reset for regional security in South Asia.

MPSC राज्य सेवा – 2025